WebThere are four Rules of Statutory Interpretation, these are the literal rule, the golden rule, the mischief rule, and the purposive approach. These rules will be discussed within the body of this essay. ... R v Allen (1872) Whiteley v. Chappell (1868). Fisher v Bell 1960 R v Maginnis 1987 R V Harris. WebI have an essay to submit and the question is regarding the rules of interpretaton and cases below are given as examples: Fisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394. Re Sigsworth [1935] 1 Ch 89. Corkery v Carpenter [1951] 1 KB 102. Can anyone please suggest any other cases I could use to backup the arguement for each rule applied?
Fisher v Bell - Wikipedia
WebCASE ANALYSIS FISHER V BELL [1961] 1 QB 394 FACTS OF THE CASE: The respondent was a shopkeeper of a retail shop in Bristol whereas the appellant was a chief inspector of police. A police constable walked past the shop and saw the display of flick knife with price attached to it. The police constable examined the knife and took it away for … WebMay 3, 2024 · For example, in Fisher v Bell (1961) ... T HE MISCHIEF RULE This question tests the candidates' knowledge on three rules of statutory interpretation, viz, the golden rule, the ejusdem generis rule and the mischief rule. (a) T HE G OLDEN R ULE In normal situations the courts would give words in a statute its ordinary or literal meaning. how is a ping helpful in cyber
Fisher v Bell - Wikipedia
WebDuport Steel v Sirs (1980) The use of the literal rule is illustrated by the case of . Fisher v Bell (1960). The Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959 made it an offence to offer … WebFisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394 case is a case that using literal rule in order to make decision to solve the case. This case is still relevant until today because the literal rule is a … WebIn statutory interpretation, any statute must be read in light of the general law. Facts. The defendant (shopkeeper) displayed a flick knife with a price tag on it in his Torquay shop … high iron saturation and low ferritin